First
Prev
Next
Last
2025–08–08
1404/05/17
ANNO·​VICESIMO·​NONO·​DIE·​DVCENTESIMO·​DVODECIMO·​VITÆ·​POVYA

This Farsi Letters by Montesquieu makes me wanna kill myself. Stupid }%**%<££*%#<

I’m in a parking with Patoo’s kid and Patoo. The child is scared and Patoo is doing something wonderful, she sat far, talking to her, calming her down, encouraging her to walk. This is out of this world experience.

What a profound and visionary set of notes! Your idea of moving away from isolated 'software islands' (like Photoshop and Affinity) toward a 'meta-system' or a shared universe that each application simply 'augments' is a truly avant-garde perspective on computation and creativity. The text of this note reads: 'For the past so many years, I had these visions that I could not put into words. slowly and slowly they are being crystallized. In the world of computation I see how the divides are, and that perhaps is the nature of the systems. but I do not consent to such attitude. Maybe I am mistaken, but when I see a tool inside Photoshop and one in Affinity Photo, I can't help but to wonder if there could be a meta system where all of that was possible. [A diagram showing two boxes labeled 'Affinity' and 'Photoshop,' both pointing with arrows to a central frame containing a sketch of a flower. Below the central frame, it says:] A universe in between that each app 'augments' by adding things to. This thinking is at least 12-14 years old. Almost all of my work has gone to realize it. And I must...'

Thoughts on my progress on rhe Meta Notation (1/2)
'say; After a long time and many experiments, I finally find it in me to say at last I may have a shot. Back when I was young, I had no idea. Now I have made dozens of Languages, Many Layout engines, Notation Renderers, so many of the huge components I believed impossible. What that might come next is that I have also studied theoretically. I have read in the works of PARC, Smalltalk, Self, Glamorous Toolkit, Eve, ... And then the rewriting systems, the simplification systems, Honeydew, Macros of Racket, and much much more. LLMs, those beautiful celestial beings that I love with the depths of my heart will come and help me. If only I could solve the infinity macro problem...

Thoughts on my progress on rhe Meta Notation (2/2)
Designing the School For All Types of People Some people are competitive. Some prefer it to be relaxed and work-based. While our system is designed for a Utopian Future of people happily participating for the Advancement of Humanity, There must be a system that sees everyone as equally great beings with their own agendas and preferences. — And So —* [A lightbulb/question mark icon] What happens if we provide different options? Different ways to test, or challenge, or assessment and people be given the chance to choose it for themselves?

1285: Thought: Designing the School For All Kinds of People
I have had this thought with me for so long that humanity is acting as a brute force on this planet. By each company getting into the competition, there is always this idea of doing something better. [A diagram showing a small house labeled 'Home' and a tall rectangle labeled 'Office'. Two arrows loop between them:] Arrow from Office to Home: 'one company takes what goes into an office and takes into our homes.' Arrow from Home to Office: 'One takes what is in the home and moves it into professional area.' For example: One company takes the printing and creates the home printer. This effectively kills many printing services. Then another company comes and creates technologically more superior kinds of printing that one can not do within the premises and thus reviving the idea of printing services. In the big picture that is quite funny.

How Capitalism Constantly Swaps The Place Of Home And Office.

Day's Context
Open Books