When you realize everything is made of elements, you think you can be the best of everything and everyone by having their best elements.
When thinking about the Mind Graph , the idea of the node is hard to define. My atomic way of seeing the node is something like this: Every idea in our head is mostly defined by the connections they have to other ideas. Their similarities to other ideas, their emotional connection to other ideas, the memories they bring up, these form a network, and the connections have different powers and weights so it is a weighted graph.
But how they are and what they actually mean? I cannot and must not define them. All ideas are defined by other ideas. Every word in the dictionary is defined by other words. But how they are formed? LLMs have embedding spaces and then neural networks with weighted graphs that store meaning in the distribution of the cells. Our minds don’t have that embedding space or attention systems as mechanical phases in between the neurons will have entirely different ways of storing these information. And so to talk about them, I must talk about the mechanisms that not only I don’t understand, I do not have the means to inspect.
But neither of these interfere with the fact that ideas are made of other ideas. Just take that as the axiom. And you can conclude the other things. How the nodes are stored or worked in the memory will be discovered, but then how they operate at the higher level, you get the mind graphs. It’s like the formula PV = nRT, the formula holds, but then you are told that well, it was more than that, it actually was:
╭ ╭ 2 ╮ ╮ │ │ a × n │ │ │ P + │ ──────── × (V - (n × b)) │ │ == (n × R × T) │ │ 2 │ │ ╰ ╰ V ╯ ╯
After four days of trying to write the equation here, I tried to incorporate MathJax and KaTeX for an easy solution, which didn’t work, so I ended up embedding Nota Language right into the Archive and using it to render the formula. I may be able to make Archive essays computable as well… that would be cool. It’s Kary 30⟡122, now, lets write the rest of this.
You really must understand that nodes are the same, they are a very low resolution notion of “Connected Ideas” + “Ideas Made Of Other Ideas” + “Some Building Block Ideas Having More Weight In Defining Another Idea”. If you find how they are made inside of the neurons you’ll have the bigger better formula, but for now these three can form the PV=nRT, all that I require as of now.