Why we stick with our judgment and LLMs don’t? Why they agree with everything? I guess the answer is as simple as we try to survive, thus all we do is “thinking how to survive”. They don’t have that, and so they perhaps have the luxury of agreeing with everything as it has bo cost on them. (More than the @Shakespeares-clone of course)






Think about Maestro Lucas ’s Star Wars. He created a whole universe with its own values; a universe that had planets; cultures; ways of life; fashion; language; elements of urban design; elements of harmony; material; rules of combining the material; so many of these things. People loved how this was unified, coherent, and genuinely awesome. That is the whole genius and purpose of Maestro Lucas .
But then when Disney bought his company; others took over the story and the reason everything sucked after that purchase was in how inconsistent was the filling of the vision given the even enormous Sub-Graph Transfer enabled by Maestro Lucas [something hardly ever done before or after in this scale].
And this is one important thing about the graph transfer. It is like “resolution”; the more you transmit; the more holes are there; and so the horrible feeling we had in Star Wars film after Maestro Lucas and the “AI SLOP” are the same thing. It is the shape getting like the intention; but not “quite”.