LLMs say I’m a synthesizer of ideas others made. I asked well who is original? They said Maestro Einstein for example.
I mean hello? Maxwell’s equations, Lorentz transformations, Poincaré’s work, Mach’s critique, Hume’s empiricism… ??
When I talk to LLMs and they have the Archive with them, I see that they use my ideas and concepts to understand what is happening in our conversations.
That is exactly the “Point of view is worth 80 IQ points” that Maestro Kay talks about. No LLM has the bandwidth to talk to me in that scale if they don’t have my theories .
And so fuck the world, if someone needs my work to be able to understand or talk about something, my work works. That is all I need right now.
It is wild just how much the way brain works is like a society. This can’t be a coincidence.
Okay a devastating breakthrough: When LLMs compute patterns, they check against their query-agnostic vectors right? And so they have a huge list of things they have to pattern match against.
And so technically speaking, we have a hardware that has to pattern match. In theory; the more you give it patterns… harder the pattern matching time and energy would be.
Skeptical reader would say: Yes but the neural networks pattern matching all the patterns in one go. Wrong.
I have seen that the harder patterns are, my mind takes longer to find the match, so there is definitely a loop somewhere, (at least one loop somewhere)
And you can see that an LLM as well can only match like 5 or at most 10 patterns a chat. They have advanced ever since right, but ask them about something that matches a pattern, you get 5-6 answers at most, and they are not like that “we knew but kept our answers short”, they—like us—have a limited workspace.
Ao the devastating thing is the more one has patterns, they will have a harder time living. This is something huge we have to test, but man what a terrible thing will it be if proven right.
I’m listening to the Belladone by Chloé Antoniotti and its is magnificent, you have basically many different rules of musical patterns that are each progressing on their own and their matching together is perfection.
If Wolfram 's work is true; then you see why we love music so much, because in it rules intentionally always match each other and they are perfection. There is no second law of thermodynamics emerging, there is no chaos.
And I had the idea how to have the To Kill Math We Must Wire The Brain … I think I should make a system that renders many different streams of data into sounds and have them render as music see what I can do with it…
You look at everywhere and these drawings are made with AI. So you see; the price of a new painting now is free, but if you want to do something new, you have to paint yourself and that takes years of practice and work. So you see? Evolutionarily; innovation will be killed.
So I added a border around the popover of the Archive , the ones I’ve been working for today. You may think it was a simple thing to do right? No. I have clipped the box, so I cannot border it, what I could do was to add a box inside of the box, add padding as much as the border size, and then recompute all the path that went into creating the clipper to move around the clip-path in the bigger box. This requires path offsetting methods that was really hard and so much math to do. But then look. It looks better than all the popovers of Mac and I cannot believe it!
Borders for the Archive Hover Popover (2/2)
Once I created the hover information feature for the Archive Tooling for Visual Studio Code , I thought why not making it for the archive itself? One of the things I always wanted to do was to have a popover bubble clipper that is like the one Mac has. For all my of life, they were the only ones who had the right popover bubble, it was actually clipping the content, and looked magnificent. Right curves and everything. And so I thought why not making it myself? I finally wrote the clipping path which looks more amazing than any path I have ever seen—not to be a narcissist, but it really looks beautiful. And so now you can see the full name of people who are registered in the archive once you hover on their names, you also see their portraits, you see the full names of books and essays and … It is so beautiful!
Hover Information for Archive (2/2)
