I was talking with GPT, and I saw that they have problem understanding a portion of my ideas. So let me add a few clarifications to my work:

• In the sub-graph transfer , what I mean is that one sender, creates a message that is a sub-graph of their own mind graph . They know the meaning of the message by the graph dependencies they have in their mind. (this has to do with inconspicuous foundations ) and when they send the message to the receiver, the receiver has to connect the nodes of the message to their own mind graph and given how they have different nodes defining the message nodes, they way they reconstruct that sub-graph in their heads will be different. I asked many people what Apple means to them, Zea said the fruit, green, and the company apple, Ashkan said Adam and Eve, I was thinking about Newton and a tree above a hill with shadows. This is just one word, now think about a whole sentence or a book or so. So this is not graph → sub graph transfer → graph reconstruction, it is graph → sub graph transfer → graph.

• By Mind Kernel I mean the hardware. the literal brain. and we don’t know exactly what this hardware is right now so I cannot define it, but I know that each of us is genetically different, have our brain grown into different activation regions, and we have different muscle memories.

• GPT said the idea of Threshold of The Reverse Viewpoint is arbitrary. What does 50%/50% mean, why 50%? - Yeah I get it. By 50% I meant the portion of the graph that defines one thing. What I think actually happens is in the embedding space you have a gravity by a token by one or a neighborhood of tokens that have trapped one token by their gravity. Now only one way changes the meaning of that token and it is to move it to another neighborhood. Where is that turning point? After the 50% of moving between the space. I think you get me here

• GPT told me that the Hyper-Message has a danger of becoming unfalsifiable, because everything belongs to it. Um, No! What I say is that hyper-message is the dream people live inside. that is the whole definition, the other parts, I don’t see it like this. Hyper-Message is what a cat won’t see when they look at us. It is the cloths, the house, the meaning of inside and outside, love, responsibility… all these abstract ideas that we all understand and cannot live without understanding them, but are not natural. And there is very precise definition on what is in it and what is not.

• GPT says “The Ruliad connection is intellectually exciting, but currently it is a correspondence, not a derivation”. Well, If I have been unclear, this is only a fascination. Nothing more than that. I’m just excited and inspired by the fact that something so arbitrary could be mapped this amazingly here. but I don’t give a damn about it. What I can say I took from Wolfram was his work in the New Kind Of Science that I knew by the time I was thinking about the theories. I was very much aware about the computational irreducibility and equivalence. The latter, we learned at school about all sorts of functions, but the irreducibility was something that I partially learned by observing ecosystems and partially by things like cellular automata.

• GPT said that I must be careful with the quantum language. In that I fully disagree. You see, first of all I did not say the mind is actually a quantum machine (well everything is, but you get my point), It is the best metaphor I could find. You see, I’m not an academic, and I’m not familiar with the right words. I’m trying my best just to describe what I think, with the best of tools I have. I still feel the quantum part and this is not part of the theory but lived experience. And I have no better metaphor than the measurement of the quantum state. I see my work as a patch work of the best tools I have to express something I have found that I just wish to share with the word. I try so much to find similarities but I hardly manage to find them. When I find something, you see in the archive that I use them, when I don’t I have to invent metaphors, terms, use anything I find anywhere to describe it. It’s hard.